People keep throwing this around and I can't really correct them all unfortunately, but as a general note: this isn't actually true.

First, the Hague Invasion Act is just a nickname that the actual act was given by its opponents. The act is actually called the
'American Service-Members' Protection Act'.

It doesn't authorize the US to invade the Netherlands. It authorizes the presidents to use "all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court."

I very much doubt that launching an invasion of one of your oldest allies and starting a war with the EU; thereby launching WW3; would qualify as "appropriate" means to secure the release of someone accused of the sort of heinous crimes the court concerns itself with.

It's meant to be able to exercise political power against countries who might be involved in extraditing US citizens to the Hague. The idea that the US would actually invade the Netherlands over this is flat out absurd. Over here, that aspect is seen as nothing more than political theatre for the American public.

Edit: No people, I'm not going to be engaging with any mental masturbatory fantasies about how the US can just do whatever and people will let them, or your personal beliefs about how to interpret legal language or that actually invading an ally is totally 'appropriate', or any variation thereof. If this applies to you, congratulations, you prove exactly my point about this law being political theatre for domestic US consumption.